Our editorial standards:
- We check claims against primary papers, public documentation, or direct sources before publishing.
- We translate marketing buzzwords into clear description of what changed.
- We do not take money or sponsorships to review or recommend tools.
Editorial Policy
How AI News Simplified reports, checks, and corrects stories.
Editorial policy
How we report and how we decide what belongs here.
We aim to be clear, fair, and useful. That means using primary sources when possible, separating proven facts from marketing claims, and telling readers instead of pretending every product demo is a finished success.
Sources first
We prefer official company posts, product pages, regulator documents, research papers, and first-hand interviews over recycled summaries.
Plain-language rule
If a sentence sounds like it belongs in a sales deck or an engineering paper, we rewrite it into normal language that a broad audience can understand.
AI is a tool, not a source
AI tools may help with drafting, structure, or research organization, but their output is treated as unverified material. We do not rely on AI alone to establish facts.
What we try to include in every story
- What actually happened
- Why it matters in real life
- What still looks uncertain
- Links to the original source material
- Clear story labels so news, recaps, and explainers are easy to tell apart
When we miss something or phrase something badly, we correct it and make the fix clear to readers. If AI-generated visuals or other synthetic media are ever used as examples, they should be clearly labeled.