The Plain-English TL;DR

Our editorial standards:

  • We check claims against primary papers, public documentation, or direct sources before publishing.
  • We translate marketing buzzwords into clear description of what changed.
  • We do not take money or sponsorships to review or recommend tools.

Editorial policy · Updated August 6, 2026

How the Small-Business AI Brief earns trust

We publish one flagship issue per Pacific calendar week. It separates verified news, vendor claims, editorial opinion, predictions, and practical guidance so an owner can tell what is known and what still needs proof.

The weekly reporting window

Each issue states its Monday-through-Sunday coverage window and exact Pacific news cutoff. Ordinary news sections use events and sources first published inside that window. A partial current-week issue says where it stops. If an issue is created later as an archive backfill, that fact is visible near the top; we do not pretend it was originally published on the issue date.

Sources and verification

  • Prefer primary sources: official announcements, release notes, documentation, filings, standards, regulations, papers, and direct records.
  • Use independent reporting for context when it adds evidence rather than repetition.
  • Label company benchmarks, adoption numbers, and performance statements as vendor claims unless independently demonstrated.
  • Link the sources a reader needs to verify the important claims.
  • Do not move later evidence into an earlier issue’s ordinary news narrative. Later evidence belongs in a clearly dated tracker update.

Facts, opinion, and predictions

Facts say what the evidence supports. “Our take” sections are opinion. A prediction records the date, time horizon, evidence that would count, and status. We return to mark calls confirmed, partly confirmed, still open, changed, or wrong. We do not quietly rewrite the original call to make it look better.

Small-business usefulness

Every weekly issue must explain why the news matters to a nontechnical owner, name what remains uncertain, recommend one bounded action, and connect to a reusable cheat sheet. We favor reversible tests with approved information and human review over impressive but uncontrolled automation.

Free consultations and editorial independence

The AI Workflow Clinic is free and does not earn a software commission. Private consultation details are not published. We may use genuinely anonymous, aggregated patterns to improve coverage only when the participant selected that separate optional permission and doing so cannot expose a participant or business. A named or identifiable story requires a separate explicit agreement. Joining the weekly email is another separate choice.

Corrections, updates, and AI assistance

Material factual corrections should be made promptly and disclosed clearly. Routine link, formatting, or clarity updates need not be framed as a factual correction. AI tools may assist with research organization, drafting, code, or production, but a person remains responsible for verification, publication, privacy, and corrections.

Conflicts and sponsored material

We do not accept payment for favorable editorial coverage. Advertising, sponsorship, affiliate relationships, supplied products, or other material conflicts must be disclosed where a reasonable reader would need that context.

Send a correction or question

Email contact@ainewssimplified.com with the page URL, disputed statement, and strongest available source.